Zuckerberg Acknowledges User Decline Amid FTC Trial

During a pivotal moment in the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) antitrust trial against Meta, CEO Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged a decline in user time spent on Facebook and Instagram. He attributed this drop to heightened competition, particularly from platforms like TikTok and YouTube, which are drawing user attention and engagement at a rapid pace.

Zuckerberg testified that ByteDance’s TikTok and Alphabet’s YouTube have emerged as dominant players in the social media space. In particular, he noted that YouTube alone now commands more user time than both Facebook and Instagram combined. This admission underlines the intense competition Meta faces in retaining user engagement.

At the core of the FTC’s lawsuit is the claim that Meta holds a monopoly in the “personal social networking” market, which it defines as platforms primarily used to connect with friends and family. The agency argues that Meta has used this dominant position to stifle competition and preserve its market leadership, despite a decline in user satisfaction.

Meta has rejected the FTC’s narrow market definition, asserting that the digital landscape is far broader. The company maintains that platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Snapchat are significant competitors, and that its past acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp were intended to enhance, not limit, innovation.

In his testimony, Zuckerberg highlighted Meta’s ongoing investment in innovation. He emphasized the company’s commitment to understanding technological advancements made by rivals and adopting new strategies to meet evolving user demands. This, he argued, is key to remaining competitive in a shifting digital environment.

The trial also brought attention to engagement metrics. While Zuckerberg acknowledged reduced time on Meta’s platforms, the FTC introduced data showing that core engagement levels on Facebook have remained relatively stable. They argue this could suggest users lack viable alternatives, reinforcing Meta’s dominant position in the market.

Meta, however, counters that engagement must be seen in context. The company points to continued user growth and increased advertising revenue as indicators of platform health. Moreover, they emphasize that users today are spreading their time across multiple platforms, not abandoning Meta entirely.

The FTC’s case could lead to significant outcomes. If the court rules against Meta, it could potentially force the company to divest its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp—two of its most valuable business assets. Such a move would mark a major shift in how digital monopolies are regulated.

Yet, the situation remains complex. While Meta may face decreasing time-share, this doesn’t necessarily reflect a fall in active users or overall platform value. Advertising revenue, brand loyalty, and user diversification suggest that Meta continues to be a dominant force in the digital economy.

Ultimately, the trial has become a crucial case study in defining digital markets and evaluating antitrust in the age of social media. The court’s decision is likely to shape not only Meta’s future, but also the broader tech industry's approach to competition, content consumption, and platform accountability.

Also Read: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's wealth increases by $10 bn