Breaking News
Microsoft is deepening its push into workplace analytics by adding Copilot adoption benchmarks to its Viva Insights platform, effectively giving managers a way to see which teams are embracing artificial intelligence—and which ones are not. The new feature, now in private preview, underscores the company’s determination to make Copilot central to daily work while also raising fresh concerns about employee monitoring in the name of productivity.
The benchmarks appear in the Microsoft Copilot Dashboard, where managers can now compare adoption levels across departments, job functions, and regions, or even evaluate how their organizations stack up against industry peers. The system shows the proportion of “active Copilot users”—defined by Microsoft as individuals who intentionally perform AI-driven actions within Microsoft 365 apps such as Teams, Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, or Loop. These metrics are aggregated over a 28-day rolling window and updated with a short delay before becoming visible on the dashboard.
According to Microsoft, the benchmarks rely on a weighted model that accounts for each team’s role composition. The company insists that all comparisons are anonymized through randomized mathematical modeling so that no individual organization’s data can be identified. The intention, Microsoft says, is to give leaders a clearer picture of adoption trends and to highlight opportunities to improve engagement with Copilot rather than to single out individual performance.
Still, the optics of the move are hard to ignore. For many, Viva Insights has long carried an aura of quiet surveillance—a sophisticated tool for tracking productivity and collaboration patterns that some see as uncomfortably close to workplace monitoring. Adding AI usage data to that mix takes the platform into even more sensitive territory. Microsoft maintains that the purpose is diagnostic, not punitive, but critics have warned that comparing adoption rates could easily morph into managerial pressure on employees who are slower to embrace AI tools.
The timing of this expansion is also telling. Microsoft has spent the past year convincing enterprise customers that Copilot, its AI-powered assistant for Microsoft 365, delivers measurable productivity gains. Licenses for the tool are expensive, and executives are demanding proof of return on investment. Benchmarking adoption gives Microsoft and its customers the data to demonstrate whether the tool is being used effectively—or at all. For organizations, it offers a way to justify ongoing AI spending; for Microsoft, it provides evidence that Copilot is becoming indispensable to modern work.
The company has also been experimenting with ways to accelerate Copilot’s reach. Earlier this month, it introduced the option for employees to bring their own Copilot licenses into the workplace—a move that could boost adoption numbers but also raises issues of data governance and “shadow IT,” where personal subscriptions bypass corporate oversight. That blurring of professional and personal use may complicate how organizations interpret the new benchmarks, since Microsoft’s current system does not distinguish between company-issued and individual licenses.
Even so, Microsoft’s message is clear: AI engagement is the new productivity metric. By quantifying how widely Copilot is used, the company is encouraging organizations to think of AI fluency as a competitive differentiator. Yet this push may risk turning genuine innovation into a numbers game, where success is measured less by the quality of AI outcomes and more by the percentage of staff using the tool. Industry observers have already drawn parallels with Microsoft’s earlier “Productivity Score” feature, which faced criticism in 2020 for allegedly enabling employee surveillance—an accusation the company later refuted by adjusting its data visibility settings.
For now, Copilot adoption benchmarks remain limited to a select group of preview customers, with broader availability expected later in October. When the rollout completes, organizations using Microsoft 365 will gain access to comparative data showing how their Copilot usage stacks up against similar companies. Whether businesses see this as a useful management tool or an unwelcome AI leaderboard will likely depend on how responsibly they use it.
As Microsoft’s AI ambitions continue to reshape the modern workplace, one thing seems certain: the company not only wants everyone to use Copilot—it also wants to know who isn’t.
The benchmarks appear in the Microsoft Copilot Dashboard, where managers can now compare adoption levels across departments, job functions, and regions, or even evaluate how their organizations stack up against industry peers. The system shows the proportion of “active Copilot users”—defined by Microsoft as individuals who intentionally perform AI-driven actions within Microsoft 365 apps such as Teams, Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, or Loop. These metrics are aggregated over a 28-day rolling window and updated with a short delay before becoming visible on the dashboard.
According to Microsoft, the benchmarks rely on a weighted model that accounts for each team’s role composition. The company insists that all comparisons are anonymized through randomized mathematical modeling so that no individual organization’s data can be identified. The intention, Microsoft says, is to give leaders a clearer picture of adoption trends and to highlight opportunities to improve engagement with Copilot rather than to single out individual performance.
Still, the optics of the move are hard to ignore. For many, Viva Insights has long carried an aura of quiet surveillance—a sophisticated tool for tracking productivity and collaboration patterns that some see as uncomfortably close to workplace monitoring. Adding AI usage data to that mix takes the platform into even more sensitive territory. Microsoft maintains that the purpose is diagnostic, not punitive, but critics have warned that comparing adoption rates could easily morph into managerial pressure on employees who are slower to embrace AI tools.
The timing of this expansion is also telling. Microsoft has spent the past year convincing enterprise customers that Copilot, its AI-powered assistant for Microsoft 365, delivers measurable productivity gains. Licenses for the tool are expensive, and executives are demanding proof of return on investment. Benchmarking adoption gives Microsoft and its customers the data to demonstrate whether the tool is being used effectively—or at all. For organizations, it offers a way to justify ongoing AI spending; for Microsoft, it provides evidence that Copilot is becoming indispensable to modern work.
The company has also been experimenting with ways to accelerate Copilot’s reach. Earlier this month, it introduced the option for employees to bring their own Copilot licenses into the workplace—a move that could boost adoption numbers but also raises issues of data governance and “shadow IT,” where personal subscriptions bypass corporate oversight. That blurring of professional and personal use may complicate how organizations interpret the new benchmarks, since Microsoft’s current system does not distinguish between company-issued and individual licenses.
Even so, Microsoft’s message is clear: AI engagement is the new productivity metric. By quantifying how widely Copilot is used, the company is encouraging organizations to think of AI fluency as a competitive differentiator. Yet this push may risk turning genuine innovation into a numbers game, where success is measured less by the quality of AI outcomes and more by the percentage of staff using the tool. Industry observers have already drawn parallels with Microsoft’s earlier “Productivity Score” feature, which faced criticism in 2020 for allegedly enabling employee surveillance—an accusation the company later refuted by adjusting its data visibility settings.
For now, Copilot adoption benchmarks remain limited to a select group of preview customers, with broader availability expected later in October. When the rollout completes, organizations using Microsoft 365 will gain access to comparative data showing how their Copilot usage stacks up against similar companies. Whether businesses see this as a useful management tool or an unwelcome AI leaderboard will likely depend on how responsibly they use it.
As Microsoft’s AI ambitions continue to reshape the modern workplace, one thing seems certain: the company not only wants everyone to use Copilot—it also wants to know who isn’t.
See What’s Next in Tech With the Fast Forward Newsletter
Tweets From @varindiamag
Nothing to see here - yet
When they Tweet, their Tweets will show up here.
