The Delhi High Court has upheld the single judge bench order, which ruled that CCI has the jurisdiction to proceed with the probe. Last year, WhatsApp introduced a revised privacy policy, after which CCI took cognisance and initiated a probe. Facebook and WhatsApp challenged this, but a single judge bench of the court rejected this plea.
The CCI also contended that the data collected, including an individual’s location, the kind of device used, their internet service provider and whom they are conversing with, would lead to the creation of a customer profile and preference which would be monetised by way of targeted advertising amounting to stalking.
The CCI has argued that it was not examining the alleged violation of individuals’ privacy which was being looked into by the Supreme Court. It had been argued before the court that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp would lead to excessive data collection and “stalking” of consumers for targeted advertising to bring in more users and is, therefore, alleged abuse of dominant position.
The social media platforms contended that when the Supreme Court was already looking into the privacy policy, CCI ought not to have “jumped the gun” and intervened in the issue. They had also said that CCI's decision was an abuse of the commission’s suo motu jurisdiction. They had claimed that the CCI in the instant case had “drifted far away” from the competition aspect and was looking into privacy issues which were already being looked into by the apex court.
See What’s Next in Tech With the Fast Forward Newsletter
Tweets From @varindiamag
Nothing to see here - yet
When they Tweet, their Tweets will show up here.