Breaking News

In a move that has sent shockwaves through global markets, President Donald J. Trump has invoked emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs on virtually all imports, citing a national emergency caused by decades of unfair trade practices. The unprecedented action, formalized through an executive order under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), signals a radical shift in U.S. trade policy, prioritizing reciprocity and domestic manufacturing over traditional free-trade principles.
The initial phase, set to take effect on April 5, 2025, will see a 10% tariff levied on all goods entering the United States. This broad-stroke measure is intended to create a baseline for a more targeted approach, which will follow on April 9, 2025. On that date, higher, individualized tariffs will be applied to nations with the largest trade deficits with the U.S., effectively penalizing those deemed to have benefited most from the perceived imbalance.
The White House argues that these tariffs are not merely economic tools but a necessary response to a national security threat. They point to the decline of U.S. manufacturing, the erosion of critical supply chains, and the dependence on foreign adversaries for essential goods as evidence of a systemic problem that requires drastic action.
The initial phase, set to take effect on April 5, 2025, will see a 10% tariff levied on all goods entering the United States. This broad-stroke measure is intended to create a baseline for a more targeted approach, which will follow on April 9, 2025. On that date, higher, individualized tariffs will be applied to nations with the largest trade deficits with the U.S., effectively penalizing those deemed to have benefited most from the perceived imbalance.
The White House argues that these tariffs are not merely economic tools but a necessary response to a national security threat. They point to the decline of U.S. manufacturing, the erosion of critical supply chains, and the dependence on foreign adversaries for essential goods as evidence of a systemic problem that requires drastic action.

"For too long, the United States has been the victim of predatory trade practices," stated a senior administration official. "This administration will no longer tolerate a system where American workers and businesses are disadvantaged. We are reclaiming our economic sovereignty."
The executive order grants President Trump broad authority to adjust tariff rates, allowing for both increases in response to retaliation and decreases in response to cooperative trade reforms. This flexibility is seen as a crucial component of the administration's strategy, enabling a dynamic and responsive approach to negotiations.
Exemptions to the tariffs are limited, primarily focusing on goods deemed essential for national security or those already subject to existing tariffs. This includes critical raw materials, pharmaceuticals, and certain energy resources. Notably, the USMCA agreement with Canada and Mexico receives special treatment, with tariff rates varying based on compliance and product type.
The administration's justification for the tariffs extends beyond economic arguments, emphasizing the need to revitalize domestic manufacturing for national security purposes. They highlight the decline in U.S. manufacturing output as a share of global production and the vulnerability of supply chains exposed during recent crises.
"A strong manufacturing base is essential for our national defense," stated a White House report. "We cannot rely on foreign producers for critical goods. This action is about ensuring our long-term security and prosperity."
The move has drawn immediate and fierce criticism from international trade partners, with many accusing the U.S. of protectionism and threatening retaliatory measures. Domestic reactions have been equally divided, with manufacturers applauding the move as a long-overdue step to level the playing field, while consumer groups and retailers warn of potential price increases and supply chain disruptions.
Economists are also divided on the long-term impact of the tariffs. Some argue that they will stimulate domestic production and create jobs, while others warn of a potential trade war that could harm the global economy. The administration, however, remains resolute, citing studies that suggest tariffs can be effective in achieving strategic objectives and that they do not necessarily lead to inflation.
The coming weeks and months will be crucial in determining the full impact of President Trump's sweeping tariffs. The world watches as the U.S. embarks on a radical departure from established trade norms, potentially reshaping the global economic landscape for years to come.
Dr Ajai Chowdhry,Founder HCL , Chairman EPIC Foundation said on "Impact of Trump’s 26% Reciprocal Tariffs on India".
"It's on expected lines. Our IT services and pharmaceutical sectors are fortunate to be exempt from these tariffs. However, globally, the economic impact will undoubtedly be significant. What's interesting is that we're poised to gain an edge over Vietnam and China in the electronics sector and will most likely outperform these countries. But we must be vigilant about China's electronic waste dump and should exercise a high level of concern . We do not, at any point of time, want to turn into a trading colony of China."
See What’s Next in Tech With the Fast Forward Newsletter
Tweets From @varindiamag
Nothing to see here - yet
When they Tweet, their Tweets will show up here.